Ask any creative what ad campaign they’d love to work on and a car or a beer campaign would probably get their vote. If only voting for an MP was that easy.
Enter politics. Now, this can be a minefield topic and one close to many people’s hearts. We at 360º are no strangers to the political advertising arena thanks mainly to the relationship we have forged with the Independent on Sunday, call it a coalition for want of a better word.
For the past few years, we have supported and supplied the IoS with a few political ad campaigns to whet the appetite of their readers and help raise some of the topical issues of the day. Whether, that has been straightforward party political advertising ideas or specific policy agendas, we have thrown ourselves into the political arena.
So, why do we do this? After all, we don’t get paid for it and we (creatives) work out of hours to do it. Well, that’s a good question and we will try to answer it like any good politician would. Now let us make ourselves absolutely clear and we think we have in the past; we believe in adding value in every area of our business and we want to improve the lives of everyone we represent…blah, blah, blah… Look, it’s just great fun. It’s an opportunity to flex some creative muscle and spin ideas that get gut reactions. It helps sharpen creative thought and gives everyone in the agency a chance to be creative – jobs for all. And, it’s a drug. Once you start doing these projects, you can’t stop.
Not only that, you learn something. I’m not sure we, as a collective, knew a great deal about the detail of the referendum planned in May for the Alternative Vote. Now we do.
So here is how it worked. We got a call from a journalist about a week before publication. He apologised for the short notice but to be honest, impactful advertising fairs better when time is of the essence. We grabbed the brief and the first available lunchtime and headed for the pub.
Get a few people in a pub with a bottle of wine and a few packets of crisps and you’ll be amazed at the productivity. This might be a good time to mention discipline. No, not where the wine or nibbles are concerned but where the ideas come from. With a brief that requires you to take a number of perspectives i.e. from all party point of views, you have to put your own political persuasions to one side to do this well. In fact, you have to sit on both sides of the fence and see the arguments from every political standpoint.
The brief was simple.
Should we change the way we vote in general elections?
Currently we run a (FPTP) First-past-the-post system which means whichever candidate gains the most votes, gains the seat; everyone gets one vote and that’s that. The grumbles come from the minority parties and the Lib Dems. They argue that a candidate can win a seat with less than 50% of the returned votes. In other words, the majority of voters didn’t want he or she to represent them in parliament.
Therefore, on May 5th, there will be a referendum asking the nation if they want to change to a different system known as (AV) Alternative Vote system. This gives the voter more than one choice. You can, if you want, vote for more than one party but must put them in order of preference. In the event that no one candidate receives 50% of the votes, the party with the least votes gets knocked out but their voters’ 2nd, 3rd or whatever number of choices they had get added to the other parties. This carries on until one party goes over the 50% target.
Our ideas

AV could create a popular but potentially weak government.

AV could take people even longer to cast votes. Chaos could ensue.

Dave and Nick may not be on speaking terms if AV gets the vote

AV will ensure politicians work hard for their seats.

Is AV one expensive makeover this country doesn’t need?

’Not like that, like that’. There is no magic answer Nick.
See, simple. There were quite a few angles we could approach; everything from the cost to taxpayers for changing the electoral system or putting a drawing pin on a safe seat to the division this referendum would cause to the coalition – Tories are keen to keep things as they are but the Lib Dems want to change and this whole issue was a key bargaining weapon for them when forming the coalition with the Tories.
For us at 360º, it was just a case of taking the different propositions and create strong ideas for them. It didn’t matter what we believed was right in terms of electoral reform; it was just the concept that mattered.
Mark































































